For the reason that very starting of the present Method 1 season, the Ferrari workforce has been going through constant and well-documented difficulties associated to journey top administration. This difficulty has emerged as one of many important components affecting the efficiency of the Maranello-based squad’s SF-25 automobile. Maybe essentially the most putting and publicly mentioned instance of this drawback got here in the course of the Chinese language Grand Prix weekend. On the Saturday, Lewis Hamilton managed to safe victory within the Dash race, delivering a robust efficiency that highlighted his talent and the potential of his setup at that second. Nevertheless, simply twenty-four hours later, automobile quantity 44 was disqualified after the post-race checks revealed extreme put on on the automobile’s ground plank. It was a transparent and simple signal that the automobile was notably delicate to the chosen journey heights and that even minor miscalculations may have dramatic penalties on compliance with the rules.
Balancing ground put on administration
Earlier than diving deeper into the technical evaluation, it is very important make clear one important side that always escapes the informal observer. Underneath the present Method 1 technical rules, which govern the so-called ground-effect or “wing automobile” period, the power of a automobile to generate vertical aerodynamic load—downforce—by way of the Venturi tunnels beneath the ground is completely essential to its total efficiency. This type of downforce is very important as a result of, in contrast to the aerodynamic load created by the entrance and rear wings, the downforce generated by the ground will not be influenced by the angle of the wings or by their incidence. As soon as this key idea is known, it turns into a lot clearer that each workforce on the grid faces related technical challenges in attempting to stability efficiency and regulatory limits.
The administration of journey top and ground put on is an extremely delicate equilibrium, one that may closely affect the result of a whole race weekend. Observe circumstances evolve continuously, temperatures change, rubber builds up, and the capability of a workforce to push the automobile proper to the mechanical and aerodynamic limits could make a serious distinction in lap time and tyre life. The perfect setup typically entails minimizing the journey top of the automobile as a lot as doable, since a decrease automobile can extract better aerodynamic effectivity from the ground. This configuration generates extra downforce and, crucially, helps to seal the ground extra successfully, stopping airflow leaks that would scale back efficiency.
Nevertheless, this strategy naturally comes with a major downside. The decrease a automobile runs, the better the chance of extreme plank put on. The wood plank—really a composite materials—mounted underneath each Method 1 automobile is regulated extraordinarily strictly by the FIA. The governing physique imposes limits to make sure that automobiles don’t run too near the bottom, which may each endanger security and grant an unfair aerodynamic benefit. After each race weekend, and relying on a random choice course of, the group of technical delegates led by Nikolas Tombazis, the FIA’s Single-Seater Technical Director, inspects the situation of the plank and the titanium skid blocks that shield it.
These measurements aren’t taken throughout all the ground space however quite at 4 particular factors which can be clearly outlined within the technical rules. Throughout a Grand Prix, the plank can put on down by a most of 1 millimeter—a restrict that the majority groups strategy very carefully, usually by only a fraction. It turns into evident, subsequently, that discovering the proper compromise between low journey top and authorized ground put on is without doubt one of the most fragile and complicated duties in Method 1 automobile setup.
The important thing parameter neglected on the SF-25
From the info collected all through the present season, mixed with varied feedback and hints supplied by members of the Ferrari technical group, it has change into more and more obvious that Ferrari is struggling greater than a few of its direct rivals on the subject of working its automobile at an optimally low journey top. The explanations behind this difficulty have at all times been advanced and never instantly clear to most of the people, however just lately, new interpretations have helped make clear the matter.
A number of the most insightful observations got here from Inaki Rueda, who at present serves as sporting director at Sauber however beforehand labored as Ferrari’s head of technique. His current statements present a number of attention-grabbing clues that join on to the difficulties Ferrari has been going through with the SF-25. In accordance with Inaki Rueda, the speed and sample of plank put on differ considerably from one workforce to a different. Sometimes, most Method 1 automobiles present the best quantity of plank put on towards the rear part of the ground, the place a considerable portion of the downforce is generated.
In distinction, the world of most put on on McLaren’s MCL39 seems to be positioned additional ahead. Which means for the McLaren automobile, essentially the most essential put on zone lies within the entrance half of the ground. This distinction implies, as Inaki Rueda defined, that the British workforce has managed to develop a simpler approach of defending essentially the most delicate elements of the ground. In follow, this permits McLaren to scale back the aerodynamic load within the areas which can be most susceptible to put on, which in flip allows the engineers to decrease the automobile even additional with out exceeding the FIA’s put on limits.
The speedy and crucial consequence of that is that McLaren can function its automobile at a journey top decrease than that of a number of rival groups, together with Ferrari. This functionality represents an important aggressive benefit. It fills within the lacking piece of an evaluation that many specialists, together with technical commentators and engineers, had began growing between March and April. At that stage of the season, it was already being speculated that sure groups had discovered simpler strategies of preserving the ground from extreme put on, which might permit them to run a extra aggressive setup by way of journey top.
Inaki Rueda additionally emphasised how difficult it’s to shift the ground put on sample ahead, on condition that a lot of the automobile’s aerodynamic load is generated on the rear. Reaching this requires a deep understanding of how the automobile’s aerodynamics, suspension geometry, and ground stiffness work together. Groups should discover methods to take care of the mandatory downforce ranges whereas concurrently redistributing the wear and tear load on the plank. For Ferrari, this has meant being compelled to run the automobile at a better journey top—roughly two setup steps increased—than key opponents like McLaren and Crimson Bull.
SF-25: the character of the journey top drawback
To make this example even clearer, Ferrari’s SF-25 seems to undergo particularly on this elementary space, because the workforce has struggled to shift the first level of ground put on additional towards the entrance of the automobile. This isn’t to say that the Ferrari ground design is inherently flawed or ineffective. Quite the opposite, it does its job effectively inside its operational window. Nevertheless, in comparison with different groups on the grid, Ferrari generates much less total downforce when the automobile is lowered aggressively, forcing the engineers to undertake a better journey top. This, inevitably, leads to a efficiency deficit, notably in high-speed corners the place ground-effect effectivity performs a decisive function.
At this stage, it’s pure to ask a key query: may the technical division led by Workforce Principal Frédéric Vasseur have solved or mitigated this difficulty in the course of the season? The reply will not be easy. Correcting such an issue is way from easy, as it could require modifying the automobile’s aerodynamic idea and mechanical setup stability—two features which can be intricately linked and very delicate. Making such adjustments in the course of the season would contain an infinite quantity of testing, simulation work, and correlation between wind tunnel knowledge and on-track efficiency.
In accordance with experiences, McLaren and Crimson Bull each devoted way more improvement time and sources to addressing this specific problem. These two groups, guided respectively by Andrea Stella and Christian Horner, have invested important engineering effort into understanding find out how to optimize the connection between ground stiffness, journey top, and aerodynamic load. Their aim has been to achieve the power to run the automobile decrease to the bottom with out exceeding the FIA put on limits.
This strategy has clearly paid off. Each McLaren and Red Bull have demonstrated superior consistency and flexibility throughout quite a lot of tracks, from road circuits like Monaco and Singapore to high-speed venues comparable to Suzuka and Silverstone. Ferrari, in the meantime, has discovered itself extra restricted in setup freedom. Due to this, Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton have usually struggled to extract the complete potential of the SF-25, notably throughout qualifying classes the place working a automobile low to the bottom is essential for peak aerodynamic efficiency.
Within the broader image, the shortcoming to completely exploit the aerodynamic potential of the automobile by decreasing the journey top has inevitably contributed to Ferrari’s inconsistent outcomes all through the 2025 Method 1 season. The Maranello workforce has proven flashes of competitiveness on sure weekends, particularly on circuits with smoother asphalt or decrease downforce necessities, however on bumpy or high-load tracks, the constraints have change into painfully evident.
Finally, this technical limitation compelled Ferrari to just accept that the SF-25 wouldn’t be capable to match the pliability and efficiency vary of its important rivals. What initially appeared like a season with robust potential for fulfillment steadily became a marketing campaign stuffed with frustration and misplaced alternatives. The persistent journey top sensitivity, mixed with the necessity to function the automobile at increased settings to keep away from extreme ground put on, reworked what may have been a triumphant 12 months for Ferrari right into a season-long wrestle for consistency and competitiveness.
And also you? What do you concentrate on Ferrari’s journey top issues with the SF-25? Tell us with a remark on the finish of the article or on our social media channels: Facebook Group / Facebook Page / Instagram / X (former Twitter) and TikTok.
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
