“That is what worries me”
The 2025 United States Grand Prix at Austin ended with Charles Leclerc taking a podium for Ferrari, whereas his teammate secured fourth place. After a weekend that started on a troublesome observe, the Scuderia managed to show issues round throughout Saturday and Sunday. Ferrari attributed this revival to superior tyre administration, though some doubts stay.
Friday challenges set the stage for uncertainty
The Austin weekend initially began poorly, with a gearbox drawback affecting automobile #16 throughout the one Friday follow session. Regardless of some optimism heading into Dash Qualifying, the truth uncovered the SF-25’s struggles over a single lap. Each drivers confronted difficulties all through the three qualifying rounds, in the end ending in eighth and tenth positions. Nonetheless, from the Dash race onward, the state of affairs of the weekend started to alter dramatically.
The controversy between tyre technique and luck
After the checkered flag on Saturday, Leclerc admitted he was not fully positive what had prompted the sudden enchancment within the SF-25’s efficiency. Ferrari group principal Frederic Vasseur later commented that the group had been in a position to higher exploit the potential of the Pirelli tyres. But, this rationalization raised some issues for former Ferrari driver and present Sky Italia commentator Ivan Capelli.
Ivan Capelli highlighted that higher readability on the precise causes behind Ferrari’s turnaround could be useful. He instructed Sky Italia: “It might assist much more if each drivers and engineers knew exactly the motivation, past what Fred [Vasseur] mentioned about tyres warming up kind of.”
Ivan Capelli’s important concern is that the efficiency achieve appears considerably unclear. “It appears to me that after once more [the performance] emerged from one thing discovered by probability slightly than by a transparent course of. That’s what worries me,” he added, reflecting on the surprising SF-25 resurgence at COTA.
As Ferrari celebrates a robust weekend in Texas, these insights from Ivan Capelli emphasize the significance of understanding whether or not efficiency enhancements are constant and repeatable, or in the event that they end result from fortuitous situations through the race. This debate could carry implications for future races and technique planning because the group goals to keep up momentum for the rest of the season.





